This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] ripe471 - language query
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Decision regarding 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 Proposal Accepted (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
David Freedman
david.freedman at uk.clara.net
Fri Sep 25 12:47:26 CEST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just a quick query w.r.t the ripe471 document relating to a conversation I had with another registry today who were confused by the use of the language: Section 5.3 (Additional Allocations) states: "An LIR may receive an additional allocation when about eighty percent (80%) of all the address space currently allocated to it is used in valid assignments or sub-allocations." Whereas Section 5.4 (Sub Allocations) states: "LIRs are still required to demonstrate about 80% usage for all their allocations." The question is therefore, do we mean: - - That all the address space currently allocated to the registry should be summed and if the registry consumes more than 80% of this they qualify for an additional allocation or - - That all allocations the registry has must each consume more than 80% before the registry qualifies for an additional allocation. and if so, could the language in the document be cleaned up to avoid such ambiguity? Dave. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkq8n74ACgkQtFWeqpgEZrL9tgCfUbDNmABC8AfnJ4YU/Rd1waU0 Ga8Anjd3WAb1cuyQ/xvd0LH9Z9ZAFilo =q7Pd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Decision regarding 2009-08
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-07 Proposal Accepted (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Policy for Allocation of ASN Blocks (ASNs) to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]