This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Wed Sep 16 22:43:42 CEST 2009
>> Because this is just for initial allocations, I think 2 to 4 years is >> a reasonable timeframe. IPv4 will run out. This is only meant to make >> sure that new entrants have a few IPv4 addresses to work with. > What are the consequences to running out significantly earlier than > 2-4 years? How important is the continued availability of small blocks > when the bulk of the IPv4 address space ahs already been allocated? trick question assuming v6 transition, how long will it take? until then, everyone will need a teensie bit of v4 to stay connected to the (declining) v4 internet. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]