[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2

On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 11:58 +0200, Sander Steffann wrote:

> Which is why I proposed to reserve space for PA initial allocations :)  I
> could be wrong here ofcourse...

Isn't it a bit of a problem that it is rather pointless to talk about
initial v4 PA allocations at the point in the end-game when it is no
longer possible to meet the requested block-size? 

In the past we've dismissed suggestions to link v4 allocations to
subjective requirements such as "must prove intention to deploy v6".
During the runout the situation changes. The only real option for a new
PA network operator will be to use v6 (unless there are
address-resources available outside the RIR-system). Thus tying micro v4
allocations to v6 PA-allocations makes perfect sense if you want to keep
the PI crowd out. 


//per