This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Sep 14 15:03:23 CEST 2009
Hi Michiel, > I would suggest we wait until we hit the final /12 and assign those > addresses as fixed /24 blocks only. Big enough for new entrants to setup > their IPv4 network and communicate with the 'legacy' internet of today. > Too small for the rest of us and force everyone to dive into the deep > with IPv6. If I understand you correctly this would be something like proposed in http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2009/msg00720.html, with a reserved /12 for initial allocations of a fixed /24 size. Or do you mean something different? Thanks, Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]