This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Sep 7 13:10:25 CEST 2009
On 6 Sep 2009, at 21:42, Nick Hilliard wrote: > In summary, I propose we drop 2008-06 and 2009-04, that we adopt > 2009-03 and that we come to realise that these endless discussions > on the assignment of the last iana /8 are not going anywhere. I could live with that. Though I'd be more than happy if discussions about what do with the last /8 continued until they didn't matter any more. :-)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]