[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 3.2

Hello again,

After my last questions I have only received concrete answers from  
Michael. He suggested the following:
- Use a minimum allocation size of /24
- Determine the maximum allocation size for every LIR based on their  
run rate
- Make no exceptions for cases where it is hard or impossible to  
downscale

Jim asked why we should change the policy at all for the final /8. I  
hope I have given at least one good reason: new entrants. Michael  
proposed to leave (further) decisions about the final /8 until IANA  
runs out of IPv4 addresses.

Does this represent the view of the community? I am not sure if people  
keep quiet because they agree with what has already been said, or  
because they are still on vacation... Please let us know :)

Thank you,
Sander Steffann
APWG co-chair