[address-policy-wg] Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?

At 12:47 26/10/2009 +0100, Andrea Cima wrote:
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>
>Dear David,
>
>David Monosov wrote:
> > Dear address-policy-wg,
> >
> > As phase 2 of the implementation of 2007-01 is well underway and gradually
> > approaching its conclusion, it might be both interesting and beneficial 
> to see
> > some details about the success of this effort so far.
> >
> > Could RIPE NCC furnish the following data at their earliest convenience 
> for the
> > benefit of this work group, and if workload permits, provide monthly 
> updates
> > until phase 2 is complete?
>
>The numbers below are from 2009-10-26.
>The total number of independent Internet number resources included in
>phase 2 are 26940 and the number of LIRs involved is 4903.
>
>Currently about 88% of independent resources involved in phase 2 have
>their status set (23790 out of 26940);
>
>Currently about 73% (3617 out of 4903) of LIRs have participated.
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User".
>
>12187 independent resources have been marked as "My End User".
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "Not My End User".
>
>6705 independent resources have been marked as "Not My End User".
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My Infrastructure".
>
>4652 independent resources have been marked as "My Infrastructure".
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" 
> for which
> > contracts and registration information were provided but are not yet 
> processed.
>
>About 750.
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" 
> for which
> > contracts and registration information were provided and subsequently 
> approved
> > by RIPE NCC.
>
>About 760 (this number and the one above also include about 200
>contracts received for independent resource transfers between LIRs).
>
>LIRs will soon be reminded about the timelines.
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" 
> for which
> > contracts and registration information were provided and subsequently 
> rejected
> > by RIPE NCC.
>
>We do not reject the contract. if the contract does not fulfill the
>requirements we will work together with the LIR to fix the inconsistency.
>
> > - Number and % of direct assignments which fall under the scope of 
> 2007-01 phase
> > 2 which remain completely untreated.
>
>About 12% (3150 independent resources).

What does RIPE NCC plan on doing with 
these?  Timeline?  Treatment?  Perhaps a  special RIPE doc for this?


>I hope this helps.

Excellently!

-Hank

>If you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Andrea Cima
>RIPE NCC
>
>
> > This data should provide some insight about the challenges that further
> > implementation phases will entail, and create an opportunity for the 
> community
> > to address such challenges on the policy level in a timely manner if 
> required.
> >
> > --
> > Respectfully yours,
> >
> > David Monosov
> >
>
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.11 (Darwin)
>Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
>iEYEARECAAYFAkrljGMACgkQXOgsmPkFrjPK9ACdFEkobOyFz0rRKdqX9JGQQwVK
>/XgAnA+T1KAUuOKXSz8X+BR9Cpkvo6FI
>=mpvE
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----