This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sun Oct 25 07:36:27 CET 2009
At 20:56 22/10/2009 +0200, David Monosov wrote: Excellent questions and I hope RIPE responds. -Hank >Dear address-policy-wg, > >As phase 2 of the implementation of 2007-01 is well underway and gradually >approaching its conclusion, it might be both interesting and beneficial to see >some details about the success of this effort so far. > >Could RIPE NCC furnish the following data at their earliest convenience >for the >benefit of this work group, and if workload permits, provide monthly updates >until phase 2 is complete? > >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User". >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "Not My End User". >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My Infrastructure". >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" for which >contracts and registration information were provided but are not yet >processed. >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" for which >contracts and registration information were provided and subsequently approved >by RIPE NCC. >- Number and % of direct assignments marked by LIRs as "My End User" for which >contracts and registration information were provided and subsequently rejected >by RIPE NCC. >- Number and % of direct assignments which fall under the scope of 2007-01 >phase >2 which remain completely untreated. > >This data should provide some insight about the challenges that further >implementation phases will entail, and create an opportunity for the community >to address such challenges on the policy level in a timely manner if required. > >-- >Respectfully yours, > >David Monosov
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Details regarding the progress of 2007-01 Phase 2 implementation?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]