This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] transfers of number resources within an LIR
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Fri Oct 23 10:32:34 CEST 2009
On 22 Oct 2009, at 22:23, <michael.dillon at bt.com> wrote: > Hostmasters who see something that looks like a transfer of number > resources should assume that it is really just outsourcing of work Er, no. They should not do that. Or make any sorts of assumptions about an LIR's business. It may well be that inside BT transfers of number resources tend to be accompanied by some sort of outsourcing arrangement. I doubt that will always be the case. Even if this was always true for every BT transfer, that doesn't mean it'll be true for any other LIR. And it would not be wise for RIPE to have LIR-specific policies or actions whenever an LIR is shuffling number resources around its organisation. > and make inquiries to confirm the status of the number resources. Yes. Which is what they should be doing anyway whenever an LIR's number resources are moved around.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RIPE staff vs Court
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]