This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nigel Titley
nigel at titley.com
Fri Oct 9 08:35:57 CEST 2009
Leo Vegoda wrote: > I would re-phrase that as "current policy only allows IANA to allocate to > RIRs in multiples of /8". I think it's worth distinguishing between a lack > of willingness and pointlessness. Until there is a policy allowing smaller > allocations to RIRs there's no point in returning anything less than a /8 to > the IANA free pool. > I never meant to imply a lack of willingness on the part of IANA and am happy to accept your correction. This of course is why this policy proposal specifically addresses both return and distribution. Nigel
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]