This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Fri Oct 2 00:31:34 CEST 2009
>> ARIN has a MAY here, both for recovery and return-to-IANA. >> RIPE has a MUST here (it's still a "may" regarding recovery, but as >> soon as it is recovered, it MUST be returned to IANA). > There appears to be a certain amount of doubt as to whether the > wording has to be identical or merely substantially the same < tact=off > < reality=on > underlying the words is substantial disagreement. arin policy wonks have zero intent to return any /8s recovered from the us military to the iana. and those /8s are specifically the subject of this lacnic proposal. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01, Global Policy for the allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]