This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Mon Nov 30 09:45:52 CET 2009
* michael dillon: > No, /60s to customer sites is not sufficient. It breaks the IPv6 > model of fixed size site allocations which assumes that all sites > will have /48 assignments unless they are private residences in > which case they will have /56 prefixes. This uniformity is essential > in order to allow people to innovate with IPv6. Ahem, future innovation with IPv6 (whatever that is, beyound disabling insecure protocol features) needs to take VSLM into account. It's also likely that the requirement that all unicast addresses most be within at least a /64 will be eventually overturned because those bits could be used in a more useful fashion. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]