This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore at linpro.no
Thu Nov 26 14:48:11 CET 2009
* Lutz Donnerhacke > I still reading this draft and try hard to find the benefit over > announcing more specific routes in 2002::/16. > > Can you please hit me into the right direction? RFC 3068. Modern client applications will prefer using IPv4 over IPv6 to connect to remote servers, if the local systems' IPv6 address is within 2002::/16. Even when behind IPv4 NAT. Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]