This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Thu Nov 26 13:25:31 CET 2009
> My main goal with supporting 6rd is to see IPv6 deployed by Service > Providers, preferably before the onslaught of CGNs leading to RFC1918 > Private IPv4 as the new default Internet Access. excuse that i am a little slow. how does 6rd address/obviate the issue which seem to drive ntt and others to cgn? from my understanding, it just lets end sites, who could care less, live in an ipv6 world through the nat4444444 core. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]