This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RE: RIPE policies and routing
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Fri May 29 11:52:11 CEST 2009
Hello Dave, >>I observe that RIPE policies can and do dictate routing requirements. >>Further, routing and address allocation are linked. Changing one will >>affect the other > > It is quite common for policy to dictate one thing, but the operator > community to do the other, > address-policy appears to be being steered somewhat by the operator > community now > (see 2006-05 for instance), perhaps we need some synchronisation with > routing-wg here? The proposer of 2009-06 is one of the chairs of the routing-wg :) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): RIPE policies and routing, was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]