[address-policy-wg] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)

Le vendredi 29 mai 2009 à 01:09 +0100, Nick Hilliard a écrit :
> On 26/05/2009 15:30, Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> > PDP Number: 2009-06
> > Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy
> 
> I support this proposal for the usual arguments:
> 
> - RIPE are not the routing police

it should for democratic purpose, for a minimal routing police not all
routing police.



> - important to maintain separation of address assignment policy from 
> routing policy
> - no definition of what the "Internet" actually means in this context
> - just because an organisation hasn't announced an ipv6 prefix on the 
> Internet-with-a-capital-I[*], that doesn't mean they aren't using the 
> address space for other entirely valid purposes.
> 

inside an operator made what it want for him and custumers, for the
outside (public) of his network , i think it must garant that others
networks are visible inside his network.

but this proposal:
Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6

suppress one requirement for the allocation only and do not garant that
the requirement stay in time.

i think : when allocation is made the ripe require(by principe), after
the operator is free (and that it is).

like for PI the ripe require routing : multihomed. multihoming may for
many reasons do not stay true in time.


bst regards.
Frederic


> Nick