This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Wed May 27 21:53:29 CEST 2009
Hello Frederic, > so we do not support this 2009-06. because this confirm to let > choice for operator so it let choice to not garant routing. Routing a block of address space *IS* the choice of the operator, and nobody can guarantee that a block of addresses is routed everywhere. RIPE policies will always leave this choice to the operators. It is even in the RIPE Terms of Reference: "IP networks collaborating in RIPE remain under the executive authority of their respective organisations". RIPE does give guidelines for network operators. A good example is http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-469.html#3 . - Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]