[address-policy-wg] RE: [policy-announce] 2009-06 New Policy Proposal (Removing Routing Requirements from the IPv6 Address Allocation Policy)

Le mercredi 27 mai 2009 à 18:36 +0200, Jeroen Massar a écrit :
> Frederic wrote:
> > we do not support this proposal and  we would garant routing for min
> > ipv6-PI block assignement.
> 
> RIPE NCC cannot guarantee anything regarding routing.

yes we know.

but we suggest that may be a good rule to write somewhere that it's ask
to LIR to garant routing.

so we do not support this 2009-06. because this confirm to let choice
for operator so it let choice to not garant routing.

bst regards.
Frederic.

>  You need to
> communicate with the rest of the parties where you want your prefix to
> go if they want to accept it or not.
> 
> Please see:
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ipv6-policies.html#routability
> (see section 4.2. Routability Not Guaranteed in RIPE-466)
> As mentioned in the text of the proposal.
> 
> 
> Clearly there is a lot of confusion about this, thus, as I mentioned in
> my other mail, the text can be amended by removing those statements, but
> then there should definitely be a clear link to the above document.
> 
> Greets,
>  Jeroen
>