[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Anycast for DLV zones

> This of 
> course does not stop someone like ISC using a chunk of their 
> existing address space to provide anycast service for 
> dlv.isc.org (or whatever). IMO, it's up to the DLV 
> cheerleaders to make the case that their zones are 
> "important" enough to deserve special anycast allocations. 

Your example is essentially saying there is no barrier for
a holder of an anycast address block, to offer more than one
anycast service from that block.

I think that address policy should be addressing that general
case of an anycast network services provider rather than dealing
with various special cases of applications that require anycast
network services. 

--Michael Dillon