This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: please remove invalid abuse contacts
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: please remove invalid abuse contacts
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: please remove invalid abuse contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Jun 4 14:35:18 CEST 2009
On 4 Jun 2009, at 13:20, Jérôme Bouat wrote: > If the abuse contact provided by the whois database is wrong then it > is an address policy issue since the contact information was wrong > when assigning an IP range. Define "wrong". Apart from the data someone inputs for themself, how can anyone know for sure any contact data in whois is correct? For some definition of "correct". In any case, I fail to see how your gripe about a full mailbox for an abuse contact in the APNIC whois database has any relevance to this list. Please take this discussion somewhere else. I am sure there are APNIC-specific lists for discussing its database, address policy and abuse issues.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: please remove invalid abuse contacts
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: please remove invalid abuse contacts
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]