This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Mon Jun 1 13:15:55 CEST 2009
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:36:33PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Andy Davidson [mailto:andy at nosignal.org] > > Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 10:55 AM > > To: Potapov Vladislav > > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net > > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and > > IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled] > > > > > > On 29 May 2009, at 11:16, <poty at iiat.ru> <poty at iiat.ru> wrote: > > > > > Then Radianz could easily create its own rules without bothering the > > > World, couldn't it? And so - use ANY IP addresses. Why should I see > > > the > > > internal networks (I use corrected "private" meanings) of Radianz or > > > other such companys? If it is NEVER interact with my or the most of > > > other networks in the Internet? > > > > Hi, Vladislav > > > > As others have tried to point out, private networks often still > > connect to the Internet, so in order to prevent connectivity problems > > between -- in this case, Radianz -- and another, unspecified network > > on the Internet, then the addressing that Radianz need to use for > > their private networks must be globally unique. > Here we have several possibilities: > 1. We have a tunnel between the internal networks - then Radianz network > do not need to be GLOBALLY unique, it should be unique only between > interconnected networks. > 2. The same network should have access to the Internet. Then it should > use NAT (not possibly in IPv6) or just be partially connected to the you should update your reading list. I ahve been using IVI (an IPv6 NAT) for a little over 18 months ... works just fine. And you should look into the IETF BEHAVE work... all about IPv6 and NAT. > Internet. The second case - is announcing the block (or part of the > block) to the Internet. The first case - internal network may have RFC > 1918 or other IP addresses. > > > > > Kind regards, > > Andy Davidson > > Vladislav Potapov > Ru.iiat >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]