[address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]

You lose your arguments? And just braving your "involvements". Ha-Ha!
I'm with RIPE from 1997, and yearly attending RIPE's meeting, so I can't
be called "not working as part of the RIPE addressing community". But it
IS not argument and I'll never be so puffed up to use it as an argument.

Vladislav Potapov
Ru.iiat

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gert Doering [mailto:gert at space.net]
> Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: Potapov Vladislav
> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] RE: Private address space in IPv4 and
> IPv6 [was something irrelevantly titled]
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 02:24:42PM +0400, poty at iiat.ru wrote:
> > > This has always been my understanding on the principles that
govern
> > > the RIRs' operation - "provide unique numbers to the people that
> > > need unique numbers".  Be it IPv4, IPv6 or ASes.
> >
> > No, because it has (providing the "numbers") the scope - the
> Internet,
> > If I want to create my own network, not connected to the scope, I
> > don't need to use any of rules of disconnected network. I'm
surprised
> > that you are not understanding and differentiating that.
> 
> To phrase this a bit more blunt: you're completely off-base.  I was
> wording this in a polite way would have permitted you to step back
> without losing face.
> 
> Before accusing people in this list that they have no clue or no
> understanding how this thing works, how the RIR system works, and so
on
> - maybe you should actually try to do a bit of reading on how long
some
> of these people have been actively working as part of the RIPE
> addressing community.
> 
> 
> > Maybe, following your thoughts, I could get the IP number for my
pet?
> > Just to be more "connected" to the network?
> 
> If your pet has an IP connection, and you can make a good point that
> it's very likely that your pet will be connected to other pets *using
> IP networks*, the point could be argued that this is a valid usage of
> IP resources.
> 
> If your pet is not using IP networking technology, it doesn't need IP
> addresses.
> 
> 
> (This was my last e-mail on this topic, and I would kindly ask the
> other mailing list participants to refrain from answering this troll
> until he shows a bit more interesting in understanding reality).
> 
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645
> 
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-
> Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279