[address-policy-wg] RE: The price of address space

[I wonder where the policy discussion went....]
[also, please fix your mailer, 200 column lines don't fit on most
 peoples displays...]

trejrco at gmail.com wrote:
> That doesn't answer what you believe about all those deploying v6, for
> whatever reasons they are deploying it ... (Reasons that vary from
environment to environment)
> 
> 
> If you want me to start listing the technical merits of IPv6 I would first
> point you to a plethora of sources - working groups, RFCs,
whitepapers, new
> product lines and modes of communication, etc.  - are you really
asking for
> a single email to encompass 10+ years of work by hundreds+ people?

Yes, please, please point me to all that information, because there are
not so many 'merits', especially technical. And if you claim there are
then either I am missing something really big, or you are just preaching
what you don't understand.

Try coming up with 5 one-liner points where IPv6 > IPv4.

I'll give you the sole real merit: More address space.
For the rest, there are not any that are significant, as they all can be
done with IPv4.

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20090724/4a0cd20a/attachment.sig>