This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Ted Mittelstaedt
tedm at ipinc.net
Fri Jul 24 00:24:55 CEST 2009
Eliot Lear wrote: > On 7/22/09 11:50 PM, michael.dillon at bt.com wrote: >> How cheap do IPv4 addresses need to be to make it worthwhile for an >> equipment vendor to buy up addresses today to drive up the price and >> make it worthwhile for the market to buy carrier grade NAT boxes? >> > > If you attend next week's IETF in Sweden, you will see quite a number of > Cisco employees involved in nearly every aspect of IPv6, including > transition technologies. We are there because we continue to believe > that there is no Plan B(*), that IPv6 is the best way for the Internet > to grow. Tell your coworkers that until Linksys-owned-by-Cisco gear gets IPv6 buttons in it, IPv6 ain't a real thing to any org under 50 employees. The RVS4000 is a good first step - now, let's extend that code to the rest of the Linksys product line. You don't want to be embarrassed by DD-WRT, after all, do you? Ted
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [arin-ppml] The price of address space
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]