This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Fri Jul 17 10:41:50 CEST 2009
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 09:41:00AM +0300, Greg wrote:
> It's not a bad proposal - there was a great discussion before.
Having "great discussions" doesn't necessarily make it a *good* proposal
either. The amount of discussions and mixed feedback we have seen tells
me that we have no consenus yet to go forward with this proposal (not
even "very rough").
I have on my TODO list to go through the PI numbers that Alex has posted
and try to figure out how "real" this percieved problem is *today*, and
then we can go forward with less emotional and more educated discussion.
regards,
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Reopening discussion on RIPE Policy Proposal 2006-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]