[address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8

Hi Randy,

Randy Bush schrieb:
>> c) don't need NAT
> 
> given
>   o ipv6 is address incompatible on the wire with ipv4
>   o during the transition, if it happens, we want to keep one internet, 
> 
> how do you do this with out 4/6 nats?

i'm sorry, as i tried to point out at the bottom of my the original 
response, this whole rant wasn't really meant 100% serious.

Of course i'm aware that such things as 6to4 etc. might be called "NAT" 
too and might be needed indeed :-)

It's just not the point of this thread, don't want to complicate it now.
I think the more important thing is to show that there is little to no 
support for his specific approach (i hope).
I just summed up some of my own point of views and exagerrated a little 
as a stylistic device.

-- 
========================================================================
= Sascha Lenz                  SLZ-RIPE          slz at baycix.de         =
= Network Design & Operations                                          =
= BayCIX GmbH, Landshut                  * PGP public Key on demand *  =
========================================================================