This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Masataka Ohta
mohta at necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp
Fri Jul 17 05:51:36 CEST 2009
TJ wrote: > "IPv6 will not be deployed soon" > > Brusque manner aside, I would be curious to know how you define "deployed". > Is it alive, in production networks today? Yes. > Are there _many_ organizations moving towards that goal? Yes. A problem is that the answers have been "Yes." for these 10 years. > encourage the yet-more-widespread use of a previous failing (loss of > addresses as meaningful, unique identifiers)? Problem of NAT is not there. Remembering a raw IPv4 address and a port number is human, while remembering a raw IPv6 address is divine, which may be the true reason why IPv6 is not really deployed at all. :-) Masataka Ohta
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Mandating NAT toward the final /8
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]