This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Stream Service || Mark Scholten
mark at streamservice.nl
Mon Jul 13 18:05:57 CEST 2009
Hello, We are not a LIR and currently there is also no plan at this moment to become a LIR in the near future. I mainly want to know if it is allowed, if it is not allowed we will not give clients IPv6 space and if they want it we forward them to also request an IPv6 PI range. With kind regards and thank for the fast answers, Mark Scholten -----Original Message----- From: Rob Evans [mailto:rhe at nosc.ja.net] Sent: maandag 13 juli 2009 15:47 To: Stream Service || Mark Scholten Cc: 'Address Policy Working Group' Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI Hi, > We are looking on getting an IPv6 PI range. But we want to use it for the > same services we are running in the IPv4 world. Could you say if it is > allowed under IPv6 PI (some say yes, some say no and if you ask me it should > be: yes, of course it is allowed). Have you tried asking the RIPE resource analysts? Are you an LIR? Is there a reason you can't apply for your own PA /32 instead of getting a PI /48? Cheers, Rob -- JANET(UK) is a trading name of The JNT Association, a company limited by guarantee which is registered in England under No. 2881024 and whose Registered Office is at Lumen House, Library Avenue, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire. OX11 0SG
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]