[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI

Dear Mark,

We recently submitted PI request tickets to ripe for IPv4 and IPv6 with
excactly the same details. The IPv4 request got assigned, the IPv6
rejected due to the difference in the policies regarding VPN connections
(internet access).


----- Original message -----
> The PI IPv6 assignment cannot be further assigned to other organisations.
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-472.html#_8._IPv6_Provider
> 
> The definition of what an Infrastructure Assignment is is different when comparing v6 and v4 policies. It is currently being discussed to align both policies.



Op 13-7-2009 15:04, Stream Service || Mark Scholten schreef:
> Hello,
> 
> We are looking on getting an IPv6 PI range. But we want to use it for the
> same services we are running in the IPv4 world. Could you say if it is
> allowed under IPv6 PI (some say yes, some say no and if you ask me it should
> be: yes, of course it is allowed).
> 
> The things we want to use IPv6 PI for:
> - dedicated servers (servers are owned by us)
> - co located servers (servers are owned by clients)
> - VPN (we have a few clients that use it, per VPN client at least 1 IP)
> - VPS guests (per VPS guest at least 1 IP)
> - https (per host an IP)
> 
> And if it is not allowed: what would happen if we do it and someone
> discovers it.
> 
> Thanks in advance for the answers.
> 
> With kind regards,
> 
> Mark Scholten
>