This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com
Tue Jul 7 05:25:28 CEST 2009
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 08:33:35AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote: > > perhaps it is my bad memory, but i have not heard anyone say that > transfer will be particularly fair. > > randy i suspect that for a valid transfer, both (presuming only two, for the purposes of this discussion) parties will consider it fair. no doubt there will be some other party who finds the situation intolerable and will involke the Robert Mugabe-like policies of exapropriation in the name of universal good. fairness is often in the eye/routing table/wallet of the beholder. --bill
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]