This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Tue Jul 7 00:53:45 CEST 2009
On 06/07/2009 23:41, Randy Bush wrote: > is this the arin list, which is all about fantasy, black helicopters, > and bullshit? No, this is the european list and we're all frightfully sensible over here. Not a single black helicopter in sight. Must be something they put in the water. I ought to inject content at this point, but the topic is perilously close to a committee discussion on potential future deck-chair arrangements. So, instead I'd like to give a "me too" to Peter Koch's contribution: On 05/07/2009 17:56, Peter Koch wrote: > before diving into these or before selecting different options, shouldn't > the overall goals of, say, "fairness" and "sustainability" be broken down > into a tangible set of criteria against which the solutions could be evaluated? > This would also ease the assessment of potential subversion tactics. We have already asked the important question "what are we trying to do?", to which "find a fair solution for doling out the last /8". As Peter and others have suggested, we cannot hope to find this "fairness" ideal unless we have a yardstick with which to measure it. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]