This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Jul 6 19:54:18 CEST 2009
Hi Milton, Rhetorical question ? Haven't got a clue on what current prises are for /24 on the black market. But we all know that not any amount of money will create more addresses as we currently have, so why not 1,000,000,000,000,000 dollar. Whould Rembrandt have realized "Portrait of a Lady Aged 62" would ever be sold for almost 20 million pounds, when he faced her to make a first draft ? Grtx, Marco On Jul 6, 2009, at 6:26 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > Any evidence that v4 addresses in /24 quantity have traded for such > sums? > > Milton Mueller > Professor, Syracuse University School of Information Studies > XS4All Professor, Delft University of Technology > ------------------------------ > Internet Governance Project: > http://internetgovernance.org > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Marco Hogewoning [mailto:marcoh at marcoh.net] >> Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:47 AM >> To: Milton L Mueller >> Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net >> Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, >> part 2 >> >> >> On Jul 5, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>>> I think it is important to think about new companies. They >> will very >>>> probably require some IPv4 address space during the transition from >>>> IPv4 to IPv6. I think the whole community will be in a lot >> of trouble >>>> if we make a policy that makes it impossible for new entrants to >>>> participate in a dual-stack world. >>>> >>> >>> A legitimate concern. But: >>> >>> 1. address transfers might make it possible for them to acquire v4 >>> addresses >> >> Transfers from whom ? The /24 they are going to get for >> 1,000,000,000,000,000 dollar from an "old company" ? >> >> MarcoH >> >> MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]