This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Jul 6 17:46:48 CEST 2009
On Jul 5, 2009, at 6:04 PM, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> >> I think it is important to think about new companies. They will very >> probably require some IPv4 address space during the transition from >> IPv4 to IPv6. I think the whole community will be in a lot of trouble >> if we make a policy that makes it impossible for new entrants to >> participate in a dual-stack world. >> > > A legitimate concern. But: > > 1. address transfers might make it possible for them to acquire v4 > addresses Transfers from whom ? The /24 they are going to get for 1,000,000,000,000,000 dollar from an "old company" ? MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]