This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Mon Jul 6 11:45:59 CEST 2009
Hello, > Keep it simple. One single fixed-size block for each new registrant > that > qualify for or already has a v6 block, and no prior v4 allocation. > > A whole /8 for might be more than necessary for this though. Maybe we can reserve a certain amount of address space for this. A whole /8 might indeed be too much. The RIPE NCC seems to grow with about 700 new LIRs each year. If we want to have at least enough for the first 5 years we need 3500 blocks of address space. Let's round that up to 4096. If we use a fixed allocation size of /22 we will need to reserve a /10. That leaves 3/4 of the final /8 for the existing LIRs. The numbers are a bit arbitrary, but it sounds reasonable to me... Sander PS: not speaking as a working group chair
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]