This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Mon Jul 6 10:36:05 CEST 2009
* Stream Service: > - IF someone/a company has IPv4 address space already they need to prove > that they use it in the right way (1 IP/VPS or 2 IP/server or 1 IP/NIC or 1 > IP/SSL certificate for example sounds reasonable for me). With current Internet standards, you need at least 4 IPv4 addresses per host if you want to implement full IP layer separation. Proprietary solutions can reduce that to 1 IPv4 address per host, but there's no IETF or IEEE standard for it, and the technology is not universally available. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]