[address-policy-wg] The final /8 policy proposals, part 2

Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
> a) Everyone gets one (and only one) fixed size block, as described in  
> 2008-06

apnic chose this path, i believe for the following reason you state:

> I think it is important to think about new companies. They will very  
> probably require some IPv4 address space during the transition from  
> IPv4 to IPv6. I think the whole community will be in a lot of trouble  
> if we make a policy that makes it impossible for new entrants to  
> participate in a dual-stack world.

Andreas Schachtner <Andreas at Schachtner.eu> wrote:
> IMHO, the "one size fits all" approach doesn't seem the right way to
> go.

you're right, of course.  but the problem is, nothing will fit all.  we
are out of ipv4 space.  concepts such as meeting needs of existing
players are now pretty much irrelevant.

randy