This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Resilience Featuresof IPv6, DNSSEC and MPLS and Deployment Scenarios
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Resilience Featuresof IPv6, DNSSEC and MPLS and Deployment Scenarios
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Implementation: IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Jan 27 11:37:21 CET 2009
> http://www.enisa.europa.eu/sta/files/resilience_features.pdf Please > spread the words among your colleagues and peers. the word i would spread is that this is more marketing than actual operational reality. a survey by the wishful as opposed to the technical. to illustrate, take the first technical point it tries to make > In terms of resilience, IPv6 could address a noteworthy source of > vulnerabilities. It is harder to launch opportunistic attacks such > as worms against IPv6 hosts and makes reconnaissance probing much > more difficult due to the vastness of the address space. The > simplified packet headers and the lack of packet fragmentation make > packet processing by routers easier and more robustly. now go look at http://www.usipv6.com/6sense/2007/jan/article01.htm oh, and ipv6 has fragmentation. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Resilience Featuresof IPv6, DNSSEC and MPLS and Deployment Scenarios
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 Implementation: IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment Policies for the RIPE NCC Service Region
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]