This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
The Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New PolicyProposal)
- Previous message (by thread): The Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): The Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jeffrey A. Williams
jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com
Thu Feb 26 03:10:07 CET 2009
Nick and all, I as a rule don't respond to spacious claims posed as questions, as I felt your earlier posts suggested to me. Further, and with all due candor, I stand by everything I say, write or otherwise utter even if others may or may not necessarily agree. I fully recognize that some of the ideas I have had, implemented with assistance at times from my staff or other professionals of various disciplines have been, and perhaps still are viewed as controversial. That assertion however in no way will EVER dissuade me, or my organization from whatever endeavors we or I choose to pursue. I am sorry to a degree, but only to a degree, that you or anyone else is for whatever reason offended, disbelieving, or disgruntled with my or our organization(s) endeavors, such is life as it were... I am still and long standing supporter of the IETF and it's endeavors a few or which I participate to the degree I can or have time to and can offer something of use or value too. This however in no way means that I do now, have in the past, or will in the future agree with the majority or minority on anything as I am a free thinker and intend to remain such all the remaining years of my life. If anyone doesn't like such I can only say: Too Bad! >:) You have a good day/evening Nick. >:) Nick Hilliard wrote: > On 23/02/2009 12:05, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > I'm fascinated to know more about INEGroup LLA. Perhaps you could point > > me to a web site explaining your policies, procedures and all that; and > > also, on what basis you claim to speak for these 284,000 members / > > stakeholders (i.e. election / appointment / etc). Also, could you also > > provide a pointer to where INEGroup LLA is registered / incorporated? > > Jeffrey, > > I'm sorry you haven't taken the time to answer these three simple > questions. A few moments of effort on your part would set to rest these > things. Indeed, many similar queries have been raised by people over the > past 12-odd years on a variety of mailing lists, concerning your many > varied, and at times rather curious claims. > > A good summary of these can be found in the Jeffrey Williams FAQ, which was > written some ten years ago. Obviously, I'm not endorsing the opinions > expressed in these postings: > > http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/08015.html > > Further concerns are expressed in other emails to the same forum, > specifically concerning claims you made to have a law degree from SMU Law > School in Dallas: > > http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/05398.html > > ... and another interesting incident, concerning a surprisingly rapid > change of organisation from "Information Eng. Group. IEG. INC." to > "Information Network Eng. Group.", following legal threats from IEG: > > http://www.gtld-mou.org/gtld-discuss/mail-archive/05347.html > > ... and claims to be living in "5 East Kirkwood Blvd., Grapevine, TX > 75208", demonstrable using Google Maps to be a non-existent postal address, > although near to Idlewild Ct, Southlake, TX. > > ... and a claim to hosting a large conference of 25k people in Dallas in > 1999 is noted here: > > > http://web.archive.org/web/20000707224140/http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg04047.html > > with followup: > > > http://web.archive.org/web/19990823224445/http://robin.fcn.net/mr99ronydebunk.html > > And further general analysis on: > > > http://web.archive.org/web/20000707224140/http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/ietf/Current/msg04047.html > > I hope I'm right in assuming that the "Jeff Williams" of this era, email > address jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com, and you are one and the same person. > Please feel free to correct me on this issue if I'm wrong. > > Sincere apologies to the AP-WG mailing list for rehashing this tedium. > > Nick Regards, Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!) "Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" - Abraham Lincoln "YES WE CAN!" Barack ( Berry ) Obama "Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt "If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by P: i.e., whether B is less than PL." United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947] =============================================================== Updated 1/26/04 CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC. ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1 at ix.netcom.com My Phone: 214-244-4827
- Previous message (by thread): The Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal)
- Next message (by thread): The Jeff Williams FAQ (was Re: [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]