This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrea Cima
andrea at ripe.net
Tue Feb 24 12:35:51 CET 2009
Dear Andy, Andy Davidson wrote: > Hi, > > A customer has indicated to me that they want PI space for a business > or project that is not incorporated. Under the new 2007-01 rules, what > is the correct way to request PI? > > In UK law, a business might not be incorporated, but in such > circumstances, the income and actions of the business are treated as > the income and actions of the principal person behind the business. > In such circumstances does this mean the individual should apply for PI? > > Previously I'd have advised to use the trading name to apply for PI, > but under new rules I am aware that PI holders need to be able to sign > contracts... The trading name might not be a legal entity able or > willing to sign. > > They plan to multihome, their need for PI appears justified to me. > This is correct, the applicant does not have to be an incorporated business. Independent Internet number resources will be assigned as long as the applicant's request is justified according to RIPE policy. RIPE Policies can be found at: http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/index.html Best regards, Andrea Cima RIPE NCC > Andy >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]