This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey Myasoedov
sergey at devnull.ru
Mon Feb 23 21:04:13 CET 2009
Hi Andy, you can register a PI space for a person, not an organisation. This person should have a contract with LIR. The policy allows to do that. Monday, February 23, 2009, 8:56:43 PM, you wrote: AD> A customer has indicated to me that they want PI space for a business AD> or project that is not incorporated. Under the new 2007-01 rules, what AD> is the correct way to request PI? AD> In UK law, a business might not be incorporated, but in such AD> circumstances, the income and actions of the business are treated as AD> the income and actions of the principal person behind the business. AD> In such circumstances does this mean the individual should apply for PI? AD> Previously I'd have advised to use the trading name to apply for PI, AD> but under new rules I am aware that PI holders need to be able to sign AD> contracts... The trading name might not be a legal entity able or AD> willing to sign. AD> They plan to multihome, their need for PI appears justified to me. -- Sergey
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 implementation clarification
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]