This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for the Allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for the Allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for the Allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Feb 20 17:07:27 CET 2009
On 20/02/2009 13:42, Nigel Titley wrote: > When the IPv4 address space runs out, anything that we get back gets > equitably shared amongst the RIRs Nigel, Can I ask what the purpose of the policy is? Each RIR is going to have sufficient local demand for locally reclaimed ipv4 address blocks that it seems unlikely to me that reassigning all these reclaimed addresses back to IANA is going to have any real effect on availability for end-users. This is particularly the case if there is going to be an address trading market where allocations have a quantifiable monetary value. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for the Allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2009-01 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for the Allocation of IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]