[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

All,

Thank you for all replies to my question:)
We support proposal 2006-01 as is and Andy's proposal to go forward.


With kind regards,



Andries Hettema
IP-Office KPN Internet
070 45 13398
ip-office at kpn.com


-----Original Message-----
On 10 Feb 2009, at 12:47, Gert Doering wrote:

> But I can see your point - there might be cases where, for whatever  
> reason,
> a LIR might want to assign a separate network to itself, and indeed  
> this
> is not currently covered by 2006-01.
[...]
>  - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0,
>    and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on
>    (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).

There are significant advantages to passing "as is" with the aim of  
getting the policy passed quickly, because I do believe there are  
networks who are not LIRs waiting for v6 PI to be allowed in Europe.

If others agree with my premise that an organisation's status with the  
NCC should not be a barrier to v6 PI, I will propose the policy to fix.

Thanks
Andy


________________________________________________________________________
______________
This inbound message to KPN has been checked for all known viruses by
KPN MailScan,
powered by MessageLabs.
For further information visit: http://www.kpn.com, keyword 'Mailscan'
________________________________________________________________________
______________