This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Tue Feb 10 19:54:13 CET 2009
Hi guys, .... i just add myself here at a random point of the thread and do a full quote intentionally to support my point that this new discussion is once again ridiculous (like full quotes :) ) at this point of the PDP, so, once again: I support this, DO implement it, do it NOW. Change the details later if nescessary. (how many times have i said that now for this proposal?) Remco van Mook schrieb: > All, > > I strongly support Marco's position on this. Let's get this policy done > asap and deal with changes in a later document. > > Kind regards, > > Remco > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net <address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net> > To: Gert Doering <gert at space.net> > Cc: address-policy-wg at ripe.net <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> > Sent: Tue Feb 10 13:18:35 2009 > Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published > (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User > Organisations) > > > On 10 feb 2009, at 13:47, Gert Doering wrote: > > > What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind > > about > > is: > > > > - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, > > and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on > > (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it). > > > > - do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round > > of discussion/review phase". > > > Let me voice support for 'move on as is' and discuss any changes to it > in a new proposal. This whole PI thing has been on hold for too long. > > Groet, > > MarcoH > > > > This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its > associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted > with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally > privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you > have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this email immediately. Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: > Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, > London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383. > -- ======================================================================== = Sascha Lenz SLZ-RIPE slz at baycix.de = = Network Design & Operations = = BayCIX GmbH, Landshut * PGP public Key on demand * = ========================================================================
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New IPv4 blocks allocated to RIPE NCC
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]