[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 02:04:26PM +0100, Stream Service wrote:
> What would be the minimum delay if there is an extra discussion/review
> phase?

At least 2-3 months - *if* we can reach consensus quickly on how the changed
version should look like.

> If I am correct RIPE will give an extra IPv6 PA assignment on request, could
> this also be an option?

I'm not sure if I fully understand this part of the question.

If I interpret this as whether "a LIR can have an extra PA blocks just by 
asking for it (while the first PA block is not full)", the answer is "no".  

As in IPv4, new PA blocks are only allocated if the existing ones are full 
(IPv4: 80%, IPv6: HD-ratio of 0.96 achieved).

There was a discussion on whether or not multiple independent PA blocks 
should be allowed for a single LIR, but it never reached "formal proposal"
stage.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279