[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

On 10/02/2009 12:56, Andy Davidson wrote:
> There are significant advantages to passing "as is" with the aim of
> getting the policy passed quickly, because I do believe there are
> networks who are not LIRs waiting for v6 PI to be allowed in Europe.
>
> If others agree with my premise that an organisation's status with the
> NCC should not be a barrier to v6 PI, I will propose the policy to fix.

policy parity with ipv4 assignment should be considered here.  There is no 
prohibition in RIPE441 that I can find which prevents LIRs from getting PI 
assignments.  Maybe someone else can advise me otherwise.

However, this policy has been on the table for just a couple of months less 
than 3 years.  Let's go ahead with it, as proposed, and the limitation on 
LIRs can be removed afterwards.

Nick