[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:29:50PM +0000, Andy Davidson wrote:
> Examples might be organisations who make assignments to end users, and  
> run anycast dns services.

Bad example, as this is what we have the anycast DNS assignment policy
for (which is currently being worked on to cover cases missing in the
first version).

But I can see your point - there might be cases where, for whatever reason,
a LIR might want to assign a separate network to itself, and indeed this
is not currently covered by 2006-01.

What you ("you" as in "the community") now need to make up your mind about
is:

  - do you want to accept 2006-01 as it is right now, in version 5.0, 
    and make amendments for the "LIR to itself" special case later on
    (to go forward, I hear people are really waiting for it).

  - do you want to adapt 2006-01, which means "at least one extra round
    of discussion/review phase".

(I'm a bit sorry to see this come up now, in the review phase, after we
had very strong support to go ahead with *what we have* in the previous
discussion phase)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279