This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie
Tue Feb 10 11:00:10 CET 2009
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 09:12 +0100, IP-Office KPN wrote: > For as I read this, a LIR can never requeste for and receive an IPv6 > PI > address space. Is this what is meant here? As I read it, IPv6 PI assignment to an LIR is simply out of scope for a policy proposal named "Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for _End User_ Organisations" (my emphasis). Best regards, Niall O'Reilly
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]