This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sergey Myasoedov
sergey at devnull.ru
Tue Feb 10 10:18:56 CET 2009
Dear Andries, Tuesday, February 10, 2009, 9:12:06 AM, you wrote: >>To qualify for IPv6 PI address space, an organisation must: >>a) not be an LIR IOK> What is the rationale behind this? That LIRs do not need IPv6 PI address IOK> space? IOK> For as I read this, a LIR can never requeste for and receive an IPv6 PI IOK> address space. Is this what is meant here? The LIR can receive /32 PA allocation at once. In this case, I don't see the reasons why LIRs can request PI blocks, which are usually smaller. -- Sergey
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2006-01 New Draft Document Published (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]