[address-policy-wg] IPv6 PI for HOSTING

> I just hear I can't use IPv6 PI network for hosting service. 
> And I want to talk about it ;)

Where did you hear this? I just looked at section 8 of RIPE-472
and there is nothing mentioned there.

> Yes, a few hosters I know are big companies, LIRs, trade 
> their traffic and so on. But majority are small companines 
> have from one server to one-two racks of hosting servers. 
> They will never become a LIR only for [useless now] IPv6 
> address space. But they host a huge piece of resources need 
> by a lot of regular users.

Yes, this is true.

> So I think we should ASAP change IPv6 PI policy to let 
> hosting be the issue for IPv6 PI assignment.

I don't see any problem with IPv6 PI and I don't understand
what you want to change. Please tell us which document
to change, and provide a suggestion for the new words
to put in the document.

--Michael Dillon