This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
Ha: [address-policy-wg] RE: an arithmetic lesson
- Previous message (by thread): Ha: [address-policy-wg] RE: an arithmetic lesson
- Next message (by thread): Ha: [address-policy-wg] RE: an arithmetic lesson
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Thu Dec 3 23:12:04 CET 2009
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 10:33:17AM -0800, David Conrad wrote:
> Allocating IPv6 /24 now when we have "plenty" of IPv6 address
> space because it makes a particular protocol proposal more convenient
> is, in my view, simply repeating history. It is _the equivalent
> of_ allocating "class As".
The math *and* the economics disagree with you.
IPv4 class A have been limited to 127 pieces, and they came for free.
There's 2 million IPv6 /24s inside FP001, and they come with a yearly
price tag, so "not everybody or their dog" are going to ask for one (and,
as I said, I know at least one LIR who is most definitely not going to
ask for one - so not even every LIR that does deploy IPv6 wants a /24).
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 144438
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
- Previous message (by thread): Ha: [address-policy-wg] RE: an arithmetic lesson
- Next message (by thread): Ha: [address-policy-wg] RE: an arithmetic lesson
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]